Ingrid Bureau, Leopoldo Petreanu, Alla Karpova
The wiring diagram is fundamental to understanding cortical function and plasticity. However, little quantitative information about functional circuits is available. What are the sources of input to a neuronal subtype in a particular layer and column and what are their relative strengths? Which connections change with novel sensory experience?
We developed laser scanning photostimulation (LSPS) into a quantitative and rapid tool for circuit analysis. In brain slices we mapped the excitatory circuits impinging onto L2/3 and L5B neurons. To determine if morphology can predict functional circuits between excitatory neurons, we directly compared functional LSPS maps with ‘geometric circuits’ computed from quantitative reconstructions of axons and dendrites. Functional connections were accurately predicted by geometry within a particular projection (with interesting exceptions), but the ratio of functional to geometric connectivity differed greatly (> 20 fold) between projections. This finding implies new forms of specificity in cortical circuits.
We performed an unbiased search for experience-dependent synaptic pathways impinging onto two types of L5B pyramidal cells, regular-spiking and intrinsically- bursting. Experience-dependent changes in excitatory L2/3 ® L5B synapses were cell-type specific. While regular-spiking neurons lost input from their home column in an experience-dependent manner, intrinsically-bursting cells gained input from surround columns.
We have used LSPS to explore the circuit and defects in animal models of fragile X mental retardation. We found specific defects in the function and plasticity of excitatory L 4 ® L 2/3 synapses.
Takashi Sato with Noah Gray
We are using 2-photon microscopy combined with Ca2+ imaging to measure the activity in neuronal populations in the intact neocortex. Neurons are labeled with membrane permeable synthetic Ca2+ indicator. Ca2+ transients evoked by action potentials can be detected as sawtooth-shaped fluorescence changes. We have developed algorithms to detect and count individual spikes based on Ca2+ imaging. Our techniques allow us to study the firing of populations of neurons with well-defined spatial relationships. We are using these tools to learn about the micoorganization of cortical maps in the somatosensory cortex and how this organization is shaped by changes in sensory experience.
Leopoldo Petreanu, Daniel Huber, Volker Scheuss
Investigation of functional circuits in the neocortex is confounded by
the intertwined nature of dendrites and axons. LSPS by UV glutamate uncaging is
a tool for selectively stimulating neurons in brain slices close to their cell
bodies, avoiding axons of passage, while recording from postsynaptic neurons.
Somata are preferentially excited because the size of the UV beam and the
soma are roughly matched. Somewhere between 10-20 neurons are excited at every
laser position, producing good signal levels. Since a laser beam can be moved
quickly, LSPS can rapidly accumulate spatial maps of monosynaptic (excitatory or
inhibitory) input for individual neurons with sub-laminar and sub-columnar
resolution (< 100 mm). We
make our LSPS mapping software and hardware available to several laboratories.
LSPS mapping by UV glutamate uncaging has
significant limitations for circuit analysis. The averaging inherent to the
technique obscures information about pair-wise connectivity. What fraction of
cells are connected? What is the distribution of the sizes of unitary currents?
Addressing these important questions requires single-cell stimulation. The
conventional method for recording from pairs of neurons using microelectrodes is
slow and inefficient, allowing only a tiny subset of projections, characterized
by unusually high connectivity, to be probed.
We are developing optical mapping with single-cell
resolution. We have two approaches to stimulating single neurons. First,
2-photon uncaging of glutamate can be spatially localized to a small (1 mm3)
focal volume. Localization of excitation favors driving single cells. However,
2-photon uncaging preferentially excites dendrites because gluRs are more
concentrated there. This is a disadvantage for a mapping technique, because
dendrites are highly entangled, while somata are not. We are testing rapid
stimulus patterns designed to selectively excite somata by 2-photon uncaging. So
far this has met with only limited success.
Second, we are bypassing gluRs and express exogenous receptors (e.g. P2X2, ATP receptors; TRPV1, capsaicin receptors, CHr2) in cortical neurons. We find that expression of Chr2 is a powerful tool for circuit analysis.
Tianyi Mao, Dan O'Connor, Vijay Iyer
Single unit studies employing tungsten microelectrodes have
revolutionized our understanding of the functional organization of the brain.
However, extracellular recordings have major drawbacks. Only one (or a few)
neuron is interrogated at a time and the cell type and location are not
well-defined. In addition, only neurons that respond vigorously to the stimulus
of interest are usually studied, biasing the sample. 2P microscopy, in
combination with fluorescent probes of neuronal function, has the potential to
overcome these problems.
Direct measurement of membrane depolarization can be achieved with
voltage-sensitive dyes
. However, imaging with single cell
resolution has remained challenging except in the most favorable circumstances
. Alternatively, action potentials
open voltage gated calcium channels (VGCCs) and cause Ca2+ influx
into the cytoplasm which can be readily detected using [Ca2+] imaging
. Populations of neurons can be loaded with membrane permeable Ca2+
indicators in vitro
and in vivo
. Using these techniques it has been possible to track the dynamics of
populations of individual neurons in vitro
and in vivo
.
A drawback of [Ca2+] indicators is that it is not
straightforward to relate fluorescence changes to number of spikes or spike
timing. First, the coupling between activity and Ca2+ accumulations
depend on a number of factors that are difficult to control: Ca2+
influx per action potential varies from cell to cell; the [Ca2+]
change depends on the amount of [Ca2+] indicator trapped in the cell
and the size of the compartment imaged; Ca2+ can enter the cell not
only through VGCCs but also through synaptic receptors and through
calcium-induced calcium release. Second, the relationship between fractional
fluorescence changes and Ca2+ accumulations by itself is complex:
resting Ca2+ levels vary from cell to cell and compartment to
compartment; membrane permeable forms of [Ca2+] indicators are often
trapped in intracellular compartments, producing variable static baseline
fluorescence; Ca2+ indicators respond sublinearly to [Ca2+]
increases. It is sometimes possible to detect saw-tooth shaped fluorescence
transients corresponding to single spikes
, but in our view the properties of the noise sources in the intact brain may
not allow single spike detection reliably in
vivo
.
Genetically encoded [Ca2+] indicators (GECI) may offer an
alternative to synthetic indicators. GECIs have been used in combination with 2P
microscopy in Drosophila
and mice
. With current GECIs their slow response kinetics, small dynamic range, and
nonlinear behavior only add to the problems discussed for synthetic indicators
above
(Pologruto et al., 2004)
. However, progress in indicator development
and data analysis tools
are rapid and substantial advances can be expected over the next few years.
We are investing significant effort in testing and developing new GECIs. We are also building a 2P microscope that allows rapid random access imaging to track the dynamics of neural populations over times of ms.